The remake of Piranha
that came out a few years ago was a bloody good time. Filled to the brim with
crazy gore, comedy and a competent understanding of 80s low-budget horror movie
tropes, Piranha 3D reveled in it’s
excess of blood and boobs thanks to the talents of director Alexandre Aja.
The inevitable sequel, Piranha
3DD, attempts to double the amount of violence and nudity while pulling
back on the scale of its predecessor. Instead of taking place on a resort lake
like the first film, this one takes place primarily within the confines of a
water park. Yes, a water park. Water slides, snack bar and a wading pool for
the kiddies. Feeling underwhelmed yet?
Lake Victoria has become a ghost town due to the eradication
of the prehistoric piranha leaving the water uninhabitable. However, a nearby
water park is hoping to draw big Spring Break crowds due to the owner opening
an “adults only” section that features strippers and all the alcohol the
tourists could possibly want. With dollar signs on the brain he doesn’t seem to
care that the water being pumped into the park is coming from Lake Victoria,
and with it a new strain of piranha that are hungry for flesh.
I understand that the film is being played for laughs and
it’s all supposed to be tongue-in-cheek, but I just don’t like the sense of
humor that writers Patrick Melton and Marcus
Dunstan infuse into their horror comedies. The original Feast I consider a minor classic. The
sequels, Feast 2: Sloppy Seconds and Feast 3: The Happy Finish, are some of
the worst pieces of insulting crap I’ve ever seen. They go out of their way to,
in my eyes, infuriate the audience with some of the dumbest shit ever typed
into Final Draft. The tossing of the baby scene? The never ending monster’s
bodily fluids scene? The catapult scene? Seriously, who thought these were good
ideas? I do enjoy their Saw sequels
and The Collector series, but when
they try to be funny they fail like no one can.
I also blame director John Gulager, who also directed the Feast films. When he made the first Feast, he was under the guidance of the Project: Greenlight crew and had some
quality back-up to keep him on track. Without them he seems to go off the
rails. His embellishments and attempts at comedy just don’t seem to jibe. I
will admit that he has talent, but maybe he should try to make a serious film,
be it horror or otherwise, next time because the sense of humor he displays
seems to be in a style only he and the writers find funny.
There are some ideas that I did find pretty hysterical, like
the baby piranha swimming up Katrina Bowden’s chach. During sex it emerges and
attacks her boyfriend’s member, which he promptly chops off. Her “Josh cut off
his penis because something came out of my vagina!” line is classic. I also
liked the scene where, during a panic at the water park, David Koechner
accidentally runs over the head of a grieving boy’s mother with a golf cart,
and while trying to console the boy he accidentally backs over it again. David
Hasslehoff’s “You little ginger bastard!” cracked me up too. The rest not so
much.
The whole production looks cheap and bargain basement. I’m
aware that the budget decreased when compared to the original since this was
supposed to be a direct-to-video release that ended up receiving a limited
theatrical run, but I’m sure the production could have done something to make
this look more professional. I mean, come on! James Wan took $1.5m and made Insidious look like it cost $50m! Put
some effort into it!
The acting is pretty bad too. I do like the fact that
Danielle Panabaker is emerging as one of a new line of scream queens (Mr. Brooks, Friday the 13th, The
Crazies, The Ward), but this is
her Terror Train. She doesn’t add
anything to the film at all, and neither does any of the cast except maybe the
return of Ving Rhames as the legless Deputy Fallon (“Get me my legs!”).
I wasn’t able to see this in 3D due to my renting it on VOD,
so maybe I was missing something that added an extra “oomph!” to the film, but
from what I could tell the effect was barely used in any effective ways except
for the random shot of something flying at the camera.
There is a blooper/outtake reel that plays over the end
credits, and when this ends up being more entertaining that the film that
precedes it you know something is wrong. While I do think this is a step up
from the Feast sequels, this is still
a far cry from the vastly superior remake. I can’t fully recommend it except to
those who actually enjoyed the Feast
sequels because this treads on some of the same ground as those festering
turds. I was not one of them.
No comments:
Post a Comment