I can be very passionate about film franchises I adore. TRON, Star Trek, The Terminator,
Jaws, Indiana Jones, etc. One of my all-time favorites is the Alien series. Each film is pretty
amazing in its own right (well, maybe not Alien:
Resurrection) due to the different approaches each writer and director have
taken the stories, be it a straight up horror film to a dark AIDS allegory. So
when I say that I was excited when the original film’s director, Ridley Scott,
announced he would return to the franchise to direct a prequel you best believe
I was EXCITED! And once the trailer was released HOLY HELL I WAS EXCITED! But
did the movie live up to my extremely high expectations? Yes and no.
The story follows Drs. Shaw (Noomi Rapace) and Holloway
(Logan Marshall-Greene) as they lead a group of scientists and military types
to a planet where they believe the progenitors of our planet originated. What
they do find is a structure filled with containers of a black substance that destroys
any form of organic material. They also learn that the “Engineers” of Earth
planned to use these canisters to wipe out the human race.
For something that was billed as a prequel to Alien my first thought as I watched this
was that I had been deceived. Sure there are little references here and there,
like the Weyland Yutani corporation (accompanied by a clever musical motif),
the use of an android and the H.R. Giger designs, but little else refers to anything that would tie directly in to
that film. The ship that the crew finds is the one from the original film, but
the setting is the wrong planet. The navigator’s chair and the design of the
Engineer’s suits are the same, but where we saw them in Alien has no bearing here. There are no eggs, facehuggers or even
aliens (well, sort of), so you can understand that as I was
watching this a sense of profound disappointment began to set in.
Then something happened. A scene so horrific played out in
front of me that it received my complete attention and was executed so
perfectly that I realized that I was beginning to really enjoy this film and
had become sucked into its extremely well thought out world and interesting
scenarios regardless of its lack of connection to the franchise. The scene I
refer to is the Cesarean section where a creature is cut from the belly of Dr.
Shaw. Sure that sounds vaguely like a scenario from the series, but this thing
got inside her via intercourse. Don’t ask.
Once I stopped applying all my completely unrealistic
expectations to the film as it played out in front of me on that IMAX screen in
3D I began to adore the immersive plot structure that would lay out a series
of fascinating ideas and allow the audience to figure out how they applied to
the story. Sure there was some stupid shit going on that took me out of it from
time to time, like one character taking off the helmet of his environmental
suit while in an atmosphere that we were told was toxic or another character
reaching out to pet an alien snake/worm thing that looks like it wants to eat
his face (and it does). There’s even a scene where one character goes into
exposition mode for no reason other than to move the story forward regardless
of the fact that he shouldn’t know anything about what’s going on around him.
Writers John Spaihts (first draft) and Damon Lindelof
(shooting draft) seemed to have clashing ideas when it came to this material. I’ve read Spaihts draft and it is all about the Alien mythos and how things came to be when the crew of the
Nostromo found them on LV-426. Most of it was pretty clever, but the dumb parts
that found their way into Prometheus
came from him. Lindelof took 90% of the Alien
tie-ins out in favor for a more mysterious and original storyline that has the
“DNA” of the series in there, but is mostly just new material. This is a good
and a bad thing. While I understand why he did what he did to Spaihts’ script
in order to keep the material unpredictable, he also made things more
complicated than they ever really needed to be and wrote himself into a corner,
which explains the odd exposition scene I mentioned earlier. He seems to have a
boner for making his plots super complex like he did with Lost, and while that might lend itself well to a television show it
doesn’t necessarily work for a feature film. I think the studio people realized
this too late and have not asked him to return to script the sequel. Sometimes
straightforward storytelling is a good thing, but oddly enough the
combination of the two scripts worked for me.
The acting is for the most part unbelievably amazing. Noomi
Rapace, hot off her performances in the Swedish The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo trilogy, was perfectly cast in the
part of Shaw. Her character isn’t written as some Ripley clone, but as a woman
of faith that has her beliefs shattered before her very eyes and has to fight
to keep them in focus. She never once comes off as an action heroine and I’m
thankful for that. Rapace’s naturalistic style is effortless and she pulls off
this complex and likable character with aplomb. The same cannot be said for her
co-star Logan Marshall-Greene. This guy is just awful. He robotically recites
his dialogue with the range of a skipping stone and never once did I believe
that he was a scientist or even a character at all. I’ve never seen him in
anything else so I can’t say if it’s him or the material, but with the casting
being so spot on everywhere else I find it hard to believe that he was hired
for his acting chops alone.
Charlize Theron had the mysterious role of Vickers down to
the slightest detail, be it a subtle expression or sly glance. You never really
know what her deal is due to her playing the part in a militaristic and
emotionless style. Even though you’re not supposed to like her you do feel
sympathy to her once the hammer comes down (literally) and you see why her
character has such a solitary nature. Idris Elba is essentially the comic
relief as the pilot of the ship, but not in a slap-stick sort of way. His
character doesn’t take things too seriously until it directly affects the ship
and the crew and he gets a handful of great lines (“Are you a robot?”). He’s
another one of those actors that makes his craft seem so easy and effortless.
But the crown jewel of this film is Michael Fassbender as
the android David. His performance can only be described as “otherworldly” due
to his character being both in awe and in disdain of humanity. He views himself
as superior to humans, but since they created him he sees them as “God” in the
way the other characters look upon the Engineers. You never really know what
angle he is coming from and that is what makes David so damned interesting. Is
he a killer? Genocidal? Is he just following orders? Is he simply
malfunctioning? Has he gone crazy after being alone on the ship for all those
years? You never really know (although in Spaihts’ script his motivations are
very clear) and I’m glad his character was written that way. It kept me on my
toes.
The FX are amazing and the 3D is some of the best around.
The depth of field utilized here was 100 times more successful than what we saw
in Avatar a few years back. The
practical effects, which were used instead CGI whenever possible, are just as
impressive. The Engineers have a creepy, blank slate sort of look to them that
gets under your skin and the other mutated creations are just as rad. However,
I think I liked the original version of the Fifield creature (as seen in the
deleted scenes on the BluRay) more than what was used in the final cut of the
film.
The score by Marc Streitenfeld is pretty awesome. The main
theme played over the astoundingly photographed opening credits is beautiful,
and the often used action music is unsettling and haunting (it was recorded in
reverse and played forwards to give it an off kilter feel). I know Harry
Gregson-Williams did a little bit of work here as well so I’ll give him a shout out
too.
Last, but certainly not least is the vision of director
Ridley Scott that made this movie work for me. He knows what he wants on screen
and makes damn sure it gets there in the way he originally intended it to be
seen. His work with the actors is clearly top notch (I don’t know what was up
with Marshall-Greene) and his visual sense is second to none. For a summer
blockbuster this was not of a super high budget, but Scott makes it look
grander and more epic than the means at his disposal allowed. When you’ve been
in the biz as long as he has I’m sure you know all the tricks to make things
work, and he hits the nail on the head at least 92% of the time. Dude’s a
master of his craft.
But like I said earlier, not all is super awesome in the
land of Prometheus. I mentioned some
issues before and I really dislike the final scene which feels like fan service
and not an organic twist in the story. I can see why some people would have a
problem with this movie as it’s about as hotly contested a geek topic as The Dark Knight Rises. I can only assume
that, like myself, people went into this movie with unreal expectations. Sure
the movie is far from perfect. The script issues can and do cause certain
problems and details are vague for major plot points, but I’ve always felt that
was the intention from the start. Some people want their movies laid out for
them on a platter without having to think about them at all, and while I do
like movies like that more often than not I do love a movie that makes me think
and use my imagination to work things out. Of all the movies released in 2012
it was Prometheus that was the
catalyst for more talk and speculation within my circle of friends than any
other film. When I’m still talking about a flick a month after it comes out you
know that it’s done something right.
Left open for a sequel or two, Prometheus left me drooling for more when the end credits rolled.
It smartly did not give the audience exactly what they wanted and instead laid
out the groundwork for something bigger than even the Alien movies could ever hope for. And that’s why I like this movie
so much. Like Shaw, the film took my expectations and allowed me to see how a
master can take them and show you something new and different instead. Say what
you will about Prometheus, but I will
always say that this is a masterpiece of science
fiction, and not sci-fi like everyone thought it would be. I like it so much it ended up on my list of top films in 2012.
4.5 out of 5
No comments:
Post a Comment