I really wanted to like Silent
Hill: Revelation, but it has way too many problems to recommend it to
filmgoers or even fans of the game series this franchise is based on.
First off, I want to say that I truly adore the original
film that came out in 2006 (you can read my review by clicking here). Regardless of its slow pacing and some cruddy
dialogue, it was tense and thrilling with excellently developed characters who
find themselves among some truly disturbing situations. I watch it at least
once a year to remind myself that you can make a great flick out of a video
game.
Using the third game in the series as it’s basis, this
sequel starts off on the right track by explaining exactly what happened at the
close of its predecessor and how Sharon
is back in the real world after being trapped in limbo with her mother. Now in
her late teens, Sharon (Adelaide Clemens), now going by the name Heather, and
her father (Sean Bean) have been moving around the country in an attempt to
stay away from the residents of Silent Hill that they fear might be coming for
them. When her father goes missing she embarks on a journey back into the
cursed town to find him and uncover exactly why she keeps having disturbing
nightmares about her real mother, the demonic Alessa.
Some really shitty dialogue aside, the film’s first 30
minutes are pretty good. The leads are developed well, the new rules are
established and Sharon/Heather is portrayed in such a way to make her instantly
sympathetic to the audience. The problem is that her love interest, Vincent
(Kit Harington), is clichéd in the extreme and his motivations are apparent
from the moment he first appears on-screen.
The acting isn’t anything to write home about either.
Adelaide Clemens tries her best to pull off her character’s dual nature, but
she isn’t able to rise above the script’s shortcomings and the overly
melodramatic dialogue (“Two halves coming together!”). She’s also not able to
pull off an American accent convincingly, and the same goes for her co-star Kit
Harington. He’s great on Game of Thrones,
but here he’s pretty awful.
Once the story moves on to Silent Hill, which for budgetary
reasons stays in icky grime mode for the entire film, things pick up with a
pretty freaky chase scene involving a spider made up of living mannequin parts
and Red Pyramid making a few awesome appearances before introducing us to the
piece’s true villain, Claudia, played by a criminally underused Carrie-Anne
Moss. It’s here that the film goes off the rails and pretty much lost me.
Claudia is introduced to the audience in such a way that we really don’t know
who she is at all. She says a few random threatening lines and disappears until
the finale. I’m assuming her part was cut down for time, but in the process the
film loses something… plot. Lots of exposition is thrown around by various
returning characters from the first movie, some are all new (Malcolm McDowell’s
oddly confusing scene), none of it interesting or integral to anything. Deborah
Kara Unger pops up again as Alessa’s mother for no good reason except to throw
a cryptic message Sharon’s
way.
For reasons I don’t know Alessa is still part of this story.
Her revenge was carried out at the finale of the first film, therefore there
really is no reason for her to be featured here. It’s a side thought for the
most part since this film doesn’t really focus on any one villain for longer
than 5 minutes total. When her storyline is wrapped up it makes little logical
sense and is underwhelming in the extreme. The same goes for the big finale
with Claudia. Sure it looks cool, but why she is what she is isn’t explained at
all, and therefore I looked upon the scene as just pure 3D spectacle. Sure is
was cool to see Red Pyramid kicking ass and taking names, but out of the last
half of the movie that’s the only thing that I can say I truly enjoyed.
The main issue here is that the film feels heavily edited.
There are jarring cutaways during important scenes (the end of the mannequin
spider chase/Claudia’s introduction), plot points are glossed over with no
reasons given (Alessa’s defeat, who Claudia really is) and the whole film just
has a rushed feeling to it. Before I knew it the movie is over and I had a hard
time trying to piece together what I’d just seen. There are pictures online of
Sharon seeing her mother in an elevator, but it sure isn’t in the movie (see below).
I hope there is an Extended Cut on video, because the flick screams that there
was a hell of a lot of stuff that was left out just to cut down the run time.
The lame set-up for another sequel left me cold. It’s not
connected to any of the characters and looks like (if there are more sequels)
the series might move in another direction. If in the right hands, like
original’s director Christophe Gans, I could get excited about it. But after
seeing this limp sequel, as well as its tiny box office returns, I don’t think
that’s going to happen. Let this franchise die here and another take over.
Where’s that Bioshock
movie?!
2 out of 5
No comments:
Post a Comment