If there was one movie that came out during the summer of
2012 that I was determined not to watch it was The Amazing Spider-Man. Why? Two reasons: 1) Spider-Man 3 was so effing bad that it left me cold to the
character, and 2) Spider-Man 3 came
out only five years ago and a reboot this soon seems like an obvious cash grab
in my eyes.
However, boredom can make you do things you never expect
to stay entertained. When I went to
check out the local Redbox this past Friday night and saw that the only new
movie in stock was The Amazing Spider-Man
I said “fuck it” and clicked “RENT”. I’m glad I only spent $1.50 and not $15 on
a 3D showing, because this flick was a total waste of my time.
We all know the story because it was told pretty damned
well ten years ago in the original Spider-Man:
Brainy nerd gets bitten by spider, gets arachnid superpowers, wins the heart of
the beautiful girl that’s out of his league and beats down a big baddie in the
name of truth, justice and the American way. This time things have been
slightly altered so it’s not exactly the same, but the fact remains that it is
just a redundant origin story of this character that we didn’t need.
I’m just going to dive into the issues I had with this
pile of flotsam. Andrew Garfield, who plays Peter Parker/Spider-Man, looks way
too old to be a high schooler, let alone romancing someone who is clearly ten
years younger than him. He also can’t seem to keep that goofy, semi-arrogant
smirk off his face, even during the serious scenes. The casting of Sally Field
and Martin Sheen as Aunt May and Uncle Ben respectively was great. The problem
is that they don’t even hold a candle to the portrayals of the characters in
the original. I blame the writing. Denis Leary looks embarrassed half the time
and even Rhys Ifans doesn’t look like he gives a shit that he’s been cast in a
huge Hollywood blockbuster.
The writing is lazy. Plot points are glossed over and
characters do things that make no sense. For example, Dr. Connors wants to grow
his missing arm back by injecting himself with a lizard DNA concoction Peter
helped him create. So when his arm does grow back what is the first thing he
does? He calls his boss and tells him to stop the human trials of the product because
something is wrong. Why? At that point in the story the process worked. Either
some footage was left on the cutting room floor or the writer just didn’t care
and had to create some sort of dramatic situation for the hell of it. The whole
movie is filled with scenes like that, where characters do stupid things that make
sense down the line but it’s as if they have some sort of foreknowledge of
events before they happen.
The villain is lame and is a total missed opportunity,
especially since Sam Raimi took the time to set-up the character so well in Spider-Man 2 and Spider-Man 3. He is non-threatening, his evil scheme is dumb and
the special effects involved in making his character look believable are pretty
awful. The Dr. Connors character goes from a gentle, yet driven man to a
complete sociopath overnight. There is no reason given as to why this happened,
and the audience is left to assume that turning into a giant lizard made him
instantly homicidal, even when he is in human form. I like Rhys Ifans as an
actor, but he was totally wrong for this part.
The non-stop action scenes are decent, but we’ve seen it
all before and better in the previous films. The difference this time is that
the action has been sped up to the point where it’s hard to follow. The 3D POV
shots are jarring in the extreme and took me out of the movie every time they
popped up, which was a lot. Some of the CGI is pretty fantastic (Spider-Man
swinging around), and other times it looks like poop (mostly involving The
Lizard). It’s a wildly inconsistent movie on all fronts as you can probably
already tell.
The whole sub-plot about Peter’s parents feels thrown
into the mix just to shake the tedium of having to re-tell the origin story all
over again. It doesn’t hold any real weight because we never really get to know
the characters except for their three minute scene at the start of the film. I
expected there to be a decently long prologue about them to help the audience
connect with Peter in a different way than in the original series, but when
they get a combined total of five lines I have to say “what was the point in
even showing Peter’s parents if we don’t get to know them before they die?”
Director Marc Webb, like Tim Story of the Fantastic Four movies, was obviously not
the guy for this job. Sure he manages to squeeze some decent acting out of his
leads, especially Emma Stone, but he seems to be content keeping the film in
the “mediocre” zone for its entire run time. If I were in his shoes I would be
hell bent on making sure that not only would my film set itself apart from the
original series in every way possible, but be so much bigger and epic to help
the audience forget that the other series ever existed. The film just cruises
along not doing anything but sucking my time, making me wish I had just popped
the original Spider-Man BluRay in instead. For some reason he seemed okay with Peter taking his mask off and exposing who he is every ten minutes, so as far as I'm concerned he get an "F" in my book.
And what was up with that lame ass after the credits
scene? Was it trying to set up some sort of mystery surrounding Norman Osborne
and Peter’s family? If that was the plan it certainly didn’t do its job very
well because it just made me say “What the hell was that?”
And lastly, this film featured the absolute worst musical
score from composer James Horner that I have ever heard. At one point this guy
was one of my favorites in the biz, and some of his early scores still get play
on my iPod (Star Trek II, Star Trek III, Battle Beyond the Stars, Krull,
Aliens), but lately he seems to just
plagiarize his previous work to crank the music out faster. There is no theme
here, no memorable bits. The score sounds generic and hokey like the X2 score. The millions Horner was paid
for this garbage was not well spent.
I will admit that Emma Stone completely won me over as
Gwen Stacy. Sure I didn’t believe for a second that she would be an intern at a
multi-billion dollar genetics corporation, but in the personal moments with
Peter I totally bought into their relationship. She’s the only person who looks
relaxed and natural in their role, and in the end when the inevitable break-up scene
with Peter went down I believed that her character was genuinely heartbroken.
Kudos to you Ms. Stone, you have an Oscar in your future.
There were some nice touches as well here and there. I
did enjoy seeing the web shooters that Peter designed instead of the organic
ones. However, he purchased the cartridges from Oscorp and I seriously doubt
some kid would be able to afford cutting edge technology like that, especially
since he bought it in bulk. Stan Lee’s cameo was pretty hilarious and the arc
of Flash Thompson was unexpected in a good way.
Totally unnecessary in every conceivable way, The Amazing Spider-Man fails on all
fronts. It should have been so much more in order to necessitate a reboot so
soon after the original trilogy ended, but there is nothing about this film to
even warrant its very existence. Apparently audiences will eat up anything that
is thrown at them with the Spider-Man
logo on it because a sequel is on the fast track with rumors of Jamie Foxx
being cast as Electro. I will not be fooled again. If I am at a Redbox in the
winter of 2014 and see that The Amazing
Spider-Man 2 is in stock and available for rental I will gladly turn and
walk away to revel in my boredom instead. It’s a lose-lose situation any way
you look at it.
1.5 out of 5
No comments:
Post a Comment